If there’s one thing we can be certain about it’s that, at some point, every politician has been asked the question: “What is your stance on video game and media violence.” Personally, I think politicians have bigger fish to fry. But families like hearing that a politician has values that coincide with their own…even if those are momentary views meant to steal votes from a rival politician.
Lori Ingham of ConChrist recently had the opportunity to ask Republican Presidential Candidate Sen. John McCain (Arizona) what he thinks about the issue of video game and media violence:
Question #1: With the current controversy over video game and media violence, what is your stance on allowing parents to make the decisions for their children on what they can see and watch? (This question was rolling around in my head primarily because of the recent posts that I had on Jack Thompson)
McCain's Answer: He felt that parents should be the ones to decide for their kids on a case by case basis (which I was satisfied with). He then did a weird segueway (sic) into the evils of child pornography from there, which kind of had me shaking my head.
While I commend Sen. McCain for stating the obvious: that parents should parent (shocker, right?), I share Lori’s confusion on his segue into child pornography issues. Sure, child pornography is a very important issue, but how does that relate, in any way, to video games? Why even set a precedent of discussing the two in the same breath?
Sadly, Lori only paraphrased his response. It would have been nice to see, word for word, how bad his actual statement was. Perhaps he wasn’t fully prepared to deal with the indicated topic. He’s not a video gamer and probably doesn’t really understand the concept or the industry. Is it even useful to have someone that far out of the loop respond to concerns about video game violence? It makes him look old and ostracizes him from gamers with the power to vote, or not vote, accordingly. In an election year where people are screaming for change, this does not seem smart to me at all.
Lori Ingham of ConChrist recently had the opportunity to ask Republican Presidential Candidate Sen. John McCain (Arizona) what he thinks about the issue of video game and media violence:
Question #1: With the current controversy over video game and media violence, what is your stance on allowing parents to make the decisions for their children on what they can see and watch? (This question was rolling around in my head primarily because of the recent posts that I had on Jack Thompson)
McCain's Answer: He felt that parents should be the ones to decide for their kids on a case by case basis (which I was satisfied with). He then did a weird segueway (sic) into the evils of child pornography from there, which kind of had me shaking my head.
While I commend Sen. McCain for stating the obvious: that parents should parent (shocker, right?), I share Lori’s confusion on his segue into child pornography issues. Sure, child pornography is a very important issue, but how does that relate, in any way, to video games? Why even set a precedent of discussing the two in the same breath?
Sadly, Lori only paraphrased his response. It would have been nice to see, word for word, how bad his actual statement was. Perhaps he wasn’t fully prepared to deal with the indicated topic. He’s not a video gamer and probably doesn’t really understand the concept or the industry. Is it even useful to have someone that far out of the loop respond to concerns about video game violence? It makes him look old and ostracizes him from gamers with the power to vote, or not vote, accordingly. In an election year where people are screaming for change, this does not seem smart to me at all.
Via: Gamepolitics and ConChrist




